Assessment Area Property Complexity Assessment Last Assessed: 18th Nov 2021 at 8:51 am Responsible Party: Detailed Assessment - Property Complexity Detailed Assessment - Property Complexity What is the current state of the common property e.g. gardens, pavements, dams, riding/walking paths, trails and the general condition of private residential/exclusive use areas/properties in the Community Scheme? * Common property and residential properties in very good condition. Common property and residential properties in good condition. Common property and residential properties in fair/average condition. Common property and residential properties in poor condition. Common property and residential properties in a mixed state. Common property and residential properties in a generally very poor state. Is the Community Scheme situated in a safe secure suburb/neighbourhood? * Yes No Suburb/Area is deteriorating Don't know/Can't establish Is the Community Scheme vulnerable to particular weather risks e.g. high winds, flooding, flash floods, storm surges, bush/veld fires, hail storms? Yes - highly vulnerable. Yes to some degree. No. Don't know/Can't establish Has the Community Scheme suffered damage due to fire, floods, high winds, cyclones, storm surges, landslides, mudslides, rockfalls, subsidence, oil/chemical spills etc.?Has the Community Scheme suffered damage fire, floods, high winds, cyclones, storm surges, landslides, mudslides, rockfalls, subsidence, oil/chemical spills etc.? Yes – significant loss has been suffered Yes - but not significant damage Yes – only minor damage suffered No, not at all Don't know/Can't establish Do the Trustees/Directors/Estate Management take pro-active steps to reduce the manageable risks or areas of vulnerability directly associated with the Community Scheme property e.g. managing potential impacts of natural disasters and adverse weather, maintenance of the facilities being provided, management of terrain/grounds, provision of added security measures, maintenance/preservation of wooden framed windows and doors/garage doors, rectification of latent construction defects, traffic and roads management etc? Yes - continual pro-active action to reduce the potential impact to the property are being taken Yes to some degree - we could be more pro-active here No, not really - we are totally reactive here and it has impacted the Community Scheme financially No, not at all with considerable negative impact Does the Community Scheme have the required reserves to be in a position to fully replace and/or maintain its infrastructure to an acceptable level/meet unexpected maintenance or infrastructure related expenditure? Yes - we have ensured that in addition to the statutory reserve requirements (MRRP), sufficient additional reserves are held for these purposes Yes to a large degree based on our extensive 10-year maintenance repair and replacement plan (MRRP) Yes to some degree - it remains debatable whether our reserves would be adequate for this purpose/extended infrastructure expenditure No, we do not have sufficient reserves for this purpose/our MRRP plan is very limited No, not all - we would be almost totally reliant on raising a special levy for this type of expenditure Is there clear accountability and responsibility for all key elements of the maintenance and upkeep of the property, buildings, infrastructure and common areas of the Community Scheme? Yes - there is very clear documented accountability and responsibility for the upkeep of these areas Yes to some degree - there is clear accountability for most of these areas No, not really - we have a number of grey areas around responsibility No, not at all - we are very vulnerable as a result of this If you are human, leave this field blank. Submit
